Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today. Learn More · Sign-up Now | Welcome to Work In Progress. We hope you enjoy your visit.
You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.
Join our community!
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:
|
Chimera/btr-60, Soviet style...
| ashhammer |
|

Group: Members
Posts: 0
Member No.: 1,900
Joined: 1-August 07

|
Hi Guys, Been working on this for a few days. I wanted to replace my Chimeras in my Soviet Cold War army with a more appropriate transport. I was going to go with a BMP-2, but after a few sketches I realized that it would be too short. I didn't want to have this give me an advantage in a normal game of 40K. (It would also cut down on arguments about cover saves.) So I switched track to the old BTR-60. So I started planning some things out and before I knew what was happening, I had a paper mock up in my hand. 48 hours later, I am at this point...   Now that I'm down to the detailing part, I had a few questions that popped up. I wanted to come to you guys to figure them out. Hopefully you can pick the better idea OR come up with an even better one. Turret - Should I go with the standard Chimera turret or the conical turret of the BTR? I'd like to stick with the original look of the BTR. I'm also of the mind to use the standard Chimera turret to make the model more recognizable to my opponents. Rear Hull - Should I go with the standard BTR rear with the port for the engine prop used while its in water or should I go with a door like on the Chimera? I figure an opponent would be intelligent enough to "imagine" a rear door, but I know I'll end up having a few arguments down the line because of it. You guys are a whole lot more laid back than some of the 40K tournament players, but what do you think? I still have a lot of work to do. I need to make the little shield that pops up on the front to defect waves while its in the water. The little vision block ports over the front two seats need to be built. I'm also going to have to figure out the lights on the front corners. The modified doors on the top still need hinges too. Phew. Lots of work. Good thing I only need about seven of them.
--------------------
My website with all my junk on it.
|
|
|
| chip6793 |
|

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Member No.: 4,807
Joined: 22-November 08

|
I can see your point about the BTR hull and the problems you see.
I think you should probably add the rear ramp as that will make it easier for your opponents to associate it to a chimera.
As for the turret, keep the Multi Laser barrel, but put it into a round turret. The normal chimera turret wouldn't look that good on a BTR hull.
|
|
|
| MrBigMr |
|
Group: Members
Posts: 169
Member No.: 1,773
Joined: 24-June 07

|
Got any pictures of it from the front and rear. Can't really see the width of the thing from these angles. I remember seeing some of those things in the army, and they were rather wide, even if they don't always look like it in photos. But other than that, looks nice. Not just nice, good.
As for the turret, how about getting a plastic steam tank turret to act as the base? It's round. If it's the right size, might look nice with some filing.
|
|
|
| elbacone |
|
Group: Members
Posts: 11
Member No.: 1,520
Joined: 16-April 07

|
what if you made some sort of prop in the lower section of the rear and two hatches in the top part of the rear?
|
|
|
| MrBigMr |
|
Group: Members
Posts: 169
Member No.: 1,773
Joined: 24-June 07

|
Maybe have the hatches lock against each other, rather than a bar in the middle, because that's the last thing you need when exiting a vehicle in a combat situation, something to get snagged on.
|
|
|
| ashhammer |
|

Group: Members
Posts: 0
Member No.: 1,900
Joined: 1-August 07

|
Chip6793, I think you're right. The stubby conical turret would be more iconic. I can use the multi-laser barrel (I have dozens of them) and a coaxial heavy stubber in it then. MrBigMr, front and rear, check.  (Sorry, took off the GW parts so I can work on it.) Elbacone, that is one of the ideas I was doodling after I posted my first message. What is the saying? "Great minds think alike".
--------------------
My website with all my junk on it.
|
|
|
| MrBigMr |
|
Group: Members
Posts: 169
Member No.: 1,773
Joined: 24-June 07

|
Yeah, that looks good. Could be a tad wider, but it'll work. From those corner shots it looked much slimmer. But so does the real BTR-60.
And I'd go with the last option with the side opening hatches. It might be least practical of the 3 for fast mounting and dismounting, but at least it would be up to part with the style of the rest of the tank.
|
|
|
| JakeW |
|
Group: Members
Posts: 0
Member No.: 5,827
Joined: 23-April 09

|
I'll go with the first one but with it all opening up to the top or down?
|
|
|
| D3V!L |
|
Group: Members
Posts: 108
Member No.: 1,359
Joined: 1-December 06

|
Have a look at the rear door of the german SdKfz 250 or 251. They had such a angled rear, too, at least on the early versions, and they had a door acros this angle. The prop(s) could be mounted on the sides of the hull
|
|
|
| Chris_The_Invincible |
|

Group: Members
Posts: 8
Member No.: 5,784
Joined: 7-April 09

|
You talked about a propeller to make it move in water, and as a result I would go with option 3 (doors opening to both sides).
I like the build so far. I really must say so. I'm thinking of making a soviet army from WWII, that sort of thing.
|
|
|
| ashhammer |
|

Group: Members
Posts: 0
Member No.: 1,900
Joined: 1-August 07

|
--------------------
My website with all my junk on it.
|
|
|
| Sonic_Monkey |
|

Group: Members
Posts: 160
Member No.: 1,031
Joined: 18-August 06

|
Oooooh - me likey! I'd love to see more! NATO vs Warsaw Pact IG would look awesome on a battlefield.
--------------------
|
|
|
| Fr1Day |
|
Group: Members
Posts: 0
Member No.: 3,725
Joined: 11-June 08

|
Nice concept.
How do the guys get out of the back?
The sloping hatches are too high off the ground and trying to exit the vehicle with a 6 foot drop to the ground would be a good way to break legs.
Squeezing out of the side hatches one at a time also sounds difficult. Did they really all climb out of the top under fire.
|
|
|
| ashhammer |
|

Group: Members
Posts: 0
Member No.: 1,900
Joined: 1-August 07

|
Sonic Monkey, that was my thought on it. I have seen a whole lot of WWII armies, but not a lot of Cold War stuff. Now I just need to con one of the guys in my local group to build a Fulda Gap blocking force for me to steam-roll.  Lt. Walke, they will be out some. Right now I have them held on with a little bit of poster tack. You may not be able to notice it right now but I only have six tires. I need to track down another 50 of them. Fr1Day, this is not the best fighting vehicle invented. The Soviets didn't put much thought into how the troops got out of any of their AFVs or APCs. At least it doesn't look like it. The good front line troops were gifted with the BMP-1s. Nice sleek low to the ground design. It was tracked, so it could keep up with the tanks. It also was so low to the ground that the gunner had to keep an eye on the troops who got out of the vehicle as it fired at chest height. Kind of demoralizing to be running into enemy fire and worrying about being shot in the back by your own wheels. The (crappy) BTR-60 went to lesser troops. Which is what mine are.  Basically my troops are going to be a rear echelon guarding force for a long range rocket artillery force. So my footies are going to be protecting a pair of Manticores (converted to look like SAM launchers) and a Deathstrike (converted to look like a Frog 3 launcher). Here is a link to a picture of American OPFORS troops getting out of a BTR-60. US Army media page. It isn't that easy to get out of. I converted mine to have a big top hatch, but the original had one small and one medium hatch on top. I didn't think my guys would be able to shoulder a lascannon out of that hole. So I gave them more room. Looks like I'm done right now. One shot of the finished CMR-60 and one with a finished Guardsman (my only one right now). 
--------------------
My website with all my junk on it.
|
|
|
| Klaus, not Santa |
|

Proud Member of W.I.P.
Group: Members
Posts: 191
Member No.: 1,680
Joined: 24-May 07

|
Excellent! Comes together quite nicely! So how did you do the back then? *edit - uh, I missed yesterdays update! The rear doors look very good. * Cheers klaus
--------------------
|
|
|
| Digits |
|
Group: Members
Posts: 0
Member No.: 6,184
Joined: 28-November 09

|
I really do like this model! Grats - it looks brilliant and the conical turret is far more fitting.
--------------------
|
|
|
| Fr1Day |
|
Group: Members
Posts: 0
Member No.: 3,725
Joined: 11-June 08

|
Yes I think yyou are right, I heard the Soviets put fuel tanks in the doors for the BMPs. That must have made it hard to get out in an emergency.
I do like the model and think it looks like a good cross between a recognisable shape and the GW rules.
Like to see it with some paint on.
|
|
|
| chip6793 |
|

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Member No.: 4,807
Joined: 22-November 08

|
7 of them!!??? Are you sure you didn't just get out of some crazy place??  Hehehe Regardless, it looks brilliant! I'm glad you went with the round turret, it most certainly looks a lot better than it would have with the original Chimera turret. Beautiful job and I would love to see the completed transport squadron once it's fully complete.
|
|
|
| MrBigMr |
|
Group: Members
Posts: 169
Member No.: 1,773
Joined: 24-June 07

|
That's good. Army flashback-inducing good. Would have rather gone with an autocannon turret (14.5mm machine gun, after all), but multi-laser is fine too.
Now make one command one with speakers that play Kalinka on an endless loop and in between tells the enemy to come over to your side and have some bread.
|
|
|
| ashhammer |
|

Group: Members
Posts: 0
Member No.: 1,900
Joined: 1-August 07

|
Oh I wish the autocannon option was in the new codex! I'd love to have a few more of them in the army. It would have suited the conversion better too. I'll live with the multi laser though. With three shots I figure I'll at least hit once with it. I'm actually going to put loud speakers on my command one. I'm going to have Creed as my army commander and he has double the range of orders compared to a normal officer. So that would make sense. I may end up doing his as a BTR-60PBK with the extra command radios. I'll see once I get the additional ones made up. One thing at a time or I'll never get done. Kalinka... on an endless loop... that may actually be a good idea. My opponents would be ready to kill themselves after a few minuets. May be advantageous...
--------------------
My website with all my junk on it.
|
|
|
Track this topic
Receive email notification when a reply has been made to this topic and you are not active on the board.
Subscribe to this forum
Receive email notification when a new topic is posted in this forum and you are not active on the board.
Download / Print this Topic
Download this topic in different formats or view a printer friendly version.
This web site is completely unofficial and in no way endorsed by Games Workshop Limited, Privateer Press, Infinity, Mongoose or any other Hobby, Model or Gaming Company.
TO WORK IN PROGRESS
|