Skin created by Romanos at Evolution Skins.

InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Free Forums. Reliable service with over 8 years of experience.

Learn More · Register Now
Welcome to The Kingdom Of Mass. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:

d Modifiers: +   -
Individual Results:

Total:
New Site!

 

 DM Policy on Rules Lawyering
Rex Tyrannus
Posted: Dec 31 2006, 10:31 PM


Merchant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Member No.: 46
Joined: 9-December 06



I didn't think I'd have to write this, but certain people have PMed me so I want to put it in writing, here, for all to read.

The impetus for this post is the OOC thread's discussion of the potential harm in having a "monster" as a PC. I ended that discussion, or at least I've tried to, and my reasons are, perhaps, not what you think.

There are two ways I can DM a game. With the first, I provide a list of books as "official" rules of this campaign and allow zero deviation. Any rules concerns are sent to the ultimate authority (the books). Any time the rules are unclear, I decide, and we move on. No discussion is needed. To me, this is very dry and flies in the face of role-playing's open-ended freedom. Frankly, I won't do it.

The second way for me to DM is to use books as guides and allow variance, open to a lot of creativity. Certainly this introduces mixed interpretations and discussions. This is good for the game. We have some passionate players here and passionate people need a voice. However, one thing passionate people often don't realize is the apathy of the dispassionate. If two people have a pages-long debate, whether it be civil or otherwise, the other five will begin to tune it out, skip whole posts or sections. What if, in the middle of a great debate about draw tensions on compound bows, I post a rules clarification that Stik misses because he had to skim through a healthy argument he wasn't terribly interested in?

Therein lies the destruction I referenced. No flame war. No incivilities. Just a long topic headed in a non-forward direction.

I will encourage players to discuss rules, but I will not allow it to get out of hand. When I end something, it is for what I perceive to be the better interest of all involved. In the end, it doesn't really matter who is more right than the other(s), but that we can enjoy ourselves. If you know you're right, be happy in that knowledge whether everyone knows it or not. Nod your head and move on with the really fun experience that is the bigger picture.

Thanks,
-RT
Top
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
InvisionFree gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community.

Topic Options



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.2145 seconds | Archive
Kingdom of Mass'
Battle Imp

is
Who's your battle imp?
Ouurd
Backstabbing: 8
Dodgin': 9
Guts: 6
Magic Mojo: 9
Smackdown: 7

Will your battle imp beat Kingdom of Mass'?
Enter your name and fight.