This skin was created by .AF of the IF Skin Zone


 

 General Election Bill 2005 (Lords), House of Lords
 
Should this bill become law?
Yes [ 4 ]  [100.00%]
No [ 0 ]  [0.00%]
Total Votes: 4
Guests cannot vote 
King James I
Posted on Jun 26 2005, 11:15 AM


King of Britannica, Grand Duke of Clementi
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 120
Member No.: 1
Joined: 11 May 05



Section 1: Length
Elections (when people may change other parties etc.) may last for three days.

Section 2: Term
The time between an election ending and election beginning must be no more than 5 months exactly.

Section 3: Campaign
The Sovereign must annoucne a general election 10 days before it begins. These 10 days shall be known as the campaign time.

Section 4: Policy promotion
During the campaign time, parties may take as much time in releasing their policies, but must have all their policies published in speeches or in their party forums etc etc by midnight on the last night of the campaign.

Section 5: Deciding
Only the Soveriegn has the power to call an election. The Soveriegn 'should' work on the advice of the Prime Minister. If the Soveriegn refuses, the Prime Minister may hold a vote in the House of Commons (that does not have to have the acceptance of the House of Lords); if the Commons supports the Prime Minister, then Soveriegn 'must' act on the Prime Minister's advice for that perticular election.


PREVIOUS SEC. 5 = (Only the Soveriegn has the power to call an election. The Soveriegn 'should' work on the advice of the Prime Minister. If the Soveriegn refuses, the Prime Minister may hold a vote in the House of Commons (that does not have to have the acceptance of the House of Lords); if the Commons supports the Prime Minister by a overall majority of 15%, and the turnout is above 50%, then Soveriegn 'must' act on the Prime Minister's advice for that perticular election.)


TIMETABLE
Saturday 26th June - Tuesday 29th June: Debate in the House of Lords
Tuesday 29th June: Vote in the House of Lords


--------------------
His Majesty King James I
King of Britannica
Grand Duke of Clementi
Supreme Head of the Anglican Church
Top
Baron Survivor
Posted on Jun 26 2005, 04:21 PM


Con. Lord
Group Icon

Group: Lords
Posts: 3
Member No.: 50
Joined: 10 June 05



I would like to start this debate off, I would like to kick off with something not to deal with this house but the Commons Committee. All of the committee discussion up to this point have been literally empty, and I determined to not let this happen in the House of Lords, even though we only have 5 members and the House of Commons has 39 members who affiliated to political parties.

Now, on to the bill. I would like to say that elections no longer concern is reality, as we are not elected but appoint by His Majesty. i think that we may soon have Sir Rob with us, so maybe we might have his knowledge to add to ours. Any thoughts from the opposition members.


--------------------
The Right Hon. Lord Survivor
Conservative Lord
Baron Survivor of Belmont
Leader of the House of Lords
Top
Baron People
Posted on Jun 26 2005, 06:31 PM


Lab. Lord
Group Icon

Group: Lords
Posts: 2
Member No.: 51
Joined: 10 June 05



For the first time I can safely say that me and my party agree with what they bills have to say. The opposition parties rightly fully amended section 5, and we are all the better for it. I don’t think we have anything really to debate on this bill, since the only we wanted to change was section to get rid of the part of section which gave the monarchy powers to stop elections being held when the prime minister wishes. I am sure the liberals will join my in this belief.


--------------------
The Right Hon. Lord People
Labour Lord
Baron People of Stockton
Leader of the Labour Party in the Lords
Top
Baron Range
Posted on Jun 26 2005, 06:32 PM


Lib. Lord
Group Icon

Group: Lords
Posts: 1
Member No.: 52
Joined: 10 June 05



Certainly we will.


--------------------
The Right Hon. Lord Range
Liberal Lord
Baron Range of Chadderton
Leader of the Liberal Party in the Lords
Top
Baron Survivor
Posted on Jun 26 2005, 06:39 PM


Con. Lord
Group Icon

Group: Lords
Posts: 3
Member No.: 50
Joined: 10 June 05



I think we are all as happy and contented we can be with this bill. Can I please just say that we were discussing holding an amendment here in the lords to bring back the original section 5, but the Prime minister has asked us not to since it would take up a lot of time as it would have to return to the Commons for debate on the amendment and the vote etc.


--------------------
The Right Hon. Lord Survivor
Conservative Lord
Baron Survivor of Belmont
Leader of the House of Lords
Top
Baron People
Posted on Jun 26 2005, 06:42 PM


Lab. Lord
Group Icon

Group: Lords
Posts: 2
Member No.: 51
Joined: 10 June 05



Thank God the Prime Minister advised you against it. It would have wasted everyone’s time and we are all happier with the original section 5 rejected anyway, this bill is perfect as it is and we dot need any more amendments.


--------------------
The Right Hon. Lord People
Labour Lord
Baron People of Stockton
Leader of the Labour Party in the Lords
Top
King James I
Posted on Jul 1 2005, 08:09 PM


King of Britannica, Grand Duke of Clementi
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 120
Member No.: 1
Joined: 11 May 05



the vote is to postponed until Monday.


--------------------
His Majesty King James I
King of Britannica
Grand Duke of Clementi
Supreme Head of the Anglican Church
Top
« Next Oldest | House of Lords | Next Newest »


Topic Options



Hosted for free by InvisionFree (Terms of Use: Updated 7/7/05) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.4089 seconds | Archive
ShowControls=1 Auto Start=true ShowDisplay=0 ShowStatusBar=1 width=300 height=75>