Knights of the Old Republic - The Movie Trilogy -> locations

locations, where to film

Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic

Caboose2012	Posted: Aug 13 2008, 04:55 PM
Jedi Padawan Group: Members Posts: 1,664 Member No.: 106 Joined: 20-January 08	eh we could do some africa scenes...700 POST!!! -------------------- "Everyone I know is dead ,but I don't seek Revenge"-Kakashi

Logan Starr	Posted: Sep 26 2009, 11:34 PM
Jedi Youngling Group: Members Posts: 762 Member No.: 215 Joined: 20-September 08	Actually I would now say: Endar Spire: Sets with some CGI Taris: Sets with CGI Ebon Hawk: Set Dantooine: Enclave a set. Plains as some field that looks identical to whats in the game. Kashyyyk: Sets with CGI. Surface, sets with CGI. Tatooine: Tunisia with CGI Manaan: Sets with CGI. Sets for Hrakart Leviathan: Sets Koriban: Sets for inside and out Unknown: sets with CGI Star Forge: sets --------------------

Revan 411	Posted: Sep 26 2009, 11:50 PM
Jedi Knight Group: Members Posts: 3,164 Member No.: 111 Joined: 11-February 08	My god... the budget for that would be around 250 million dollars or something. Computer Generation Imagery wouldn't be too good anyway. I think real locations should be used as filming instead of CGI and sets all the freaking time. --------------------

Logan Starr	Posted: Sep 27 2009, 01:44 AM
Jedi Youngling Group: Members Posts: 762 Member No.: 215 Joined: 20-September 08	Mainly sets. Just very good and realistic sets. Only CGI for things sets can't do. What is wrong with sets, they are often better than on location. --------------------

Caboose2012	Posted: Sep 27 2009, 02:03 AM
Jedi Padawan Group: Members Posts: 1,664 Member No.: 106 Joined: 20-January 08	yeah CGI these days don't really look at all real -------------------- "Everyone I know is dead ,but I don't seek Revenge"-Kakashi

Revan 411

Posted: Sep 27 2009, 04:09 AM

Jedi Knight

Group: Members
Posts: 3,164
Member No.: 111
Joined: 11-February 08

QUOTE (Logan Starr @ Sep 26 2009, 09:44 PM)

What is wrong with sets, they are often better than on location.

Locations > Sets.

One of the reasons why I liked Episode I and Episode II of the prequel trilogy's is because, unlike Episode III, they were filmed in real spots, and real locations. The Naboo scenes in Episode II were filmed in Italy and the Tatooine scenes in Episode I were filmed in Tunisia.

Sets are only useful for indoor environments such as a apartment complex or a military base or even the inside of a space ship. They do not have to be used for exterior environments.

And slapping CGI on everything would be completely pointless and a waste of money. Only use it when you HAVE to use it. Such as Taris, Nar Shaddaa etc..

This post has been edited by Revan 411 on Sep 27 2009, 04:16 AM

--------------------

Logan Starr	Posted: Sep 27 2009, 04:26 AM
Jedi Youngling Group: Members Posts: 762 Member No.: 215 Joined: 20-September 08	No I disagree. Sets are heaps better. Even for things like Kashyyyk surface I would say sets would work. Places like the outside of Koriban would work better as sets. And CGI would only be added when necassary. --------------------

ECLIP5E	Posted: Oct 30 2009, 04:06 AM
Midichlorian Group: Members Posts: 216 Member No.: 306 Joined: 8-March 09	For the cities and ships like Taris, The Ebon Hawk, The Endar Spire, The Star Forge it would have to be sets and CGI. For Dantooine I could see maybe Alberta or some place with praries and plains with minimal CG. Kashyykk would yeah probably be a national park somewhere. Tatooine and possibly Korriban obivously Tunisia or Egypt for tomb stuff. Lehon, Hawaii. Now mannan would HAVE to be a set with greenscreen. -------------------- Life is what you make of it.

1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

0 Members:

« Next Oldest | The Saga | Next Newest »